14. "I had long been puzzled by the behavior of the whaling industry.... [W]hales, which could provide a permanent resource if harvested prudently, were overexploited and driven toward extinction. This mysteriously "self-destructive" behavior of the industry was explained to me by a Japanese economist. Like most conservationists, I had assumed the industry's goals would be to maximize the sustainable annual yield of whales. In fact the industry has been trying to maximize the present value of the whale resource. If various species of whales are driven to extinction... the capital can be turned to the rape of another (in the minds of economists) array of available resources. Such behavior [is] perfectly rational in the dominant economic paradigm...." (From Erlich, Paul. "Environmental Disruption: Implications for the Social Sciences." Social Science Quarterly, March 1981, p 10.) From what you have learned in these readings, do you think Erlich (or the unnamed Japanese economist) understands the usual view of economists about why whales are threatened with extinction? Explain. (Hint: Does the whaling industry have goals or do individual whalers have goals?)
|
|